Scientific evidence from independent and university-based research centres shows that the Waterpik® Water Flosser is an easy and more effective alternative to string floss, air floss and interdental brushes.
Water Flosser compared to Interdental Brush on Bleeding Scores and Gingival Abrasion ObjectiveTo compare the effectiveness of a Waterpik Water Flosser (WF) and interdental brush (IDB) on bleeding …
Comparison of a novel sonic toothbrush to standard brushing and flossing on clinical signs of inflammation: A randomized clinical trial Objective To determine the effectiveness of Waterpik Sonic&ndash …
Evaluation of the Plaque Removal Efficacy of a Water Flosser Compared to String Floss in Adults After a Single Use Objective To compare the plaque removal efficacy of the Waterpik Water Flosser to str …
Safety of a Water Flosser: A Literature Review Objective Since the introduction of the first Waterpik Water Flosser in 1962, over sixty clinical trials have been published. Collectively, the studies d …
Comparison of the Effect of Two Interdental Cleaning Devices Around Implants on the Reduction of Bleeding: a 30-day Randomized Clinical Trial Objective To compare the efficacy of a Waterpik Water Flos …
Comparison of Water Flosser and Interdental Brush on Plaque Removal: A Single-Use Pilot Study Objective To determine the efficacy of a Waterpik Water Flosser vs. interdental brushes for plaque removal …
